Not on board with the candidate, an attempt to just assume them all away.” But her efforts are being stymiedīy a campaign apparatus rooted in the belief that any new reality can be overturned by pretending it away.ĭuncan “Atrios” Black, another influential liberal blogger, links to Marshall’s post and adds this concurrence: “Mark Penn’s pronouncements, and others from the campaign (he’s not the only one), give me that watching-an-Ari-Fleischer-press-conference feeling. There are plenty of delegates still out there for Clinton to win - over a thousand left in the remaining primaries. The mind-boggling decision not even to contest a slew of states where Obama racked up huge victories and many delegates.Ĭampaigns are about winning votes not making excuses. Much of Clinton’s current predicament stems from Penn’s disastrous, glass-jaw ‘inevitability’ strategy and Particularly Democratic primary races is one of almost constant defeats. But this is a guy who has basically one big political win under his belt and whose record in seriously contested races, Obama.”Ĭlinton is ultimately responsible for putting her political fate in this fool’s hands. Up to yesterday’s gem: “Could we possibly have a nominee who hasn’t won any of the significant states - outside of Illinois? That raises some serious questions about Sen. So now you have Penn successively saying caucus wins don’t really count, small state wins don’t really count, medium state wins don’t really count, states with large African-American populations don’t really count, all building Mark Penn, the chief strategist for the Clinton campaign, has been engaging in “aggressive pitches of complete nonsense,” Marshall writes. Ridiculousness that has increasingly permeated her campaign apparatus since early January.” I don’t mean the candidate or her policies or the premises of her candidacy. In defiance of the rules imposed by the Democratic National Committee.Īn “unreality,” Marshall writes, “seems more and more to suffuse the Clinton campaign. Others dislike her campaign’s pledges to attempt to seat the Florida and Michigan delegations at the Democratic convention in August, even though those two states held their primary elections Marshall is one of many liberal bloggers who object to the Clinton campaign’s attempts to win the Democratic presidential nomination with superdelegates instead of with victories in primaries and caucuses across Clinton is “carving a path to the nomination through the heart of the (Via Breitbart).Has Hillary Clinton lost the netroots? Josh Marshall, perhaps the ur-blogger for online Democrats, writes at Talking Points Memo that Mrs. The Clintons took the cash from Uranium One officials before the deal was approved by Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The Clintons hid the donations which is a clear violation of the Memorandum of Understanding Hillary Clinton signed with the Obama administration wherein she promised and agreed to publicly disclose all donations during her tenure as Secreatary of State. All Russian roads lead to Hillary, Podesta and Obama. Hillary Clinton was in the middle of this corruption. Coincidence? The Deep State FBI KNEW about this corruption and pay-to-play the entire time.Īs previously reported, prior to the Obama administration approving the very controversial deal in 2010 giving Russia 20% of America’s Uranium, the FBI had evidence that Russian nuclear industry officials were involved in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering in order to benefit Vladimir Putin, says a report by The Hill. John Podesta previously served as then-President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff and was Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman during the 2016 election. The Podestas are a fixture in the Clinton camp. Podesta’s firm continued to make money lobbying for Uranium One in 2015, after Hillary Clinton already left the State Department. The Podesta Group which was founded by brothers Tony and John Podesta (although John Podesta hasn’t worked for the company in several years) was paid $40,000 by Uranium One to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service and the National Security Council for “international mining projects,” according to a Jfiling, Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller reported. TRENDING: Did You Know the Supreme Court Will Finally Hear a Case This Fall on Election Law - Something They Punted on Back in December 2020? - Stewart Rhodes and Jonathon Moseley Weigh In (AUDIO) Uranium One paid The Podesta Group $40,000 to lobby the State Department, the Senate, the National Park Service and the National Security Council for “international mining projects,” according to a Jfiling. Senate records show that The Podesta Group has lobbied the State Department on behalf of Uranium One - once in 2012, when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state, and once in 2015.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |